Editor checklist
Certification Foundations - when authorities differ
Referencing the content of Robert's Rules, Mason's Manual, Sturgis, AIP Standard Code, and Mackey where applicable
These notes flag places where parliamentary authorities regularly diverge in wording, precedence, or practice.
For launch, the learner-facing lessons choose one main path and point here when editors or learners need contrast.
-
Lay on the table
- Usually in your main path
- Teach the stricter urgent-business use first.
- Also check
- Many groups use table as a casual way to kill a motion.
- If you teach the wrong version
- Learners build a habit that creates confusion and unfairness in live meetings.
- Suggested action
- Keep the public lessons precise and point learners here when customs differ.
-
Seconding nominations
- Usually in your main path
- Seconds for nominations are often unnecessary when the assembly is plainly nominating.
- Also check
- Some groups still require a second by custom or local rule.
- If you teach the wrong version
- Members may challenge a valid nomination or assume custom outranks rule.
- Suggested action
- Separate organization custom from the parliamentary baseline.
This page does not replace your organization's governing documents or adopted authority. Add dated citations in your local editor log when you confirm a source.